In her candid account of her therapy sessions, Emily Ratajkowski discusses how she was able to overcome her “fear of abandonment.”
The model talked about improving herself by researching attachment patterns on her “High Low” podcast on Thursday.
The actress began by saying, “I’ve been in therapy for a while.
Ratajkowski, 31, said that although she first tested for a “anxious preoccupied” attachment style when she started treatment, she has since advanced to a “more secure” form.
The actress went on to describe the traits of worried people after divorcing husband Sebastian Bear-McClard earlier this year after an infidelity scandal.
It suggests you don’t want to be alone at all, she explained. “You generally have an optimistic perspective of others and a negative one of yourself.
“They often seek approval, support, responsiveness from their partner. You’re always turning to your parent for more reassur[ance],” Ratajkowski continued.
After receiving counseling for a “considerable amount of time,” the actress “learned to be independent.”
According to the “iCarly” alum, “For me, it was actually in therapy where I learned to be independent and get to the source of my fear of abandonment,” even though other individuals benefit from the assistance of supportive partners.
With her 1-year-old son Sylvester, Ratajkowski stated that she is attempting to establish a “secure” relationship.
Three months after announcing her intention to divorce her spouse Sebastian Bear-McClard, with whom she had a kid, the model made these remarks.
One year before Ratajkowski and Bear-McClard declared their quits, Sylvester was born in March 2021.
Since then, the “We Are Your Friends” performer has garnered media attention for her outings with Pete Davidson and DJ Orazio Rispo. In September, she was also romantically associated with Brad Pitt.
In the meanwhile, Ratajkowski stated in an interview with Harper’s Bazaar in October that she no longer wants to be a “pick-me girl” while seeking for love.
The author of “My Body” admitted at the time, “I wasn’t very adept at picking what I loved [before]”. Therefore, going out to dinner with someone is now a lot of fun and makes you feel cool. These passages of them were incredibly enjoyable. I really didn’t enjoy the rest of it.
It’s so lovely, she exclaimed. Other than my kid, who is the only man I owe anything to, I owe nobody anything.
December 9, 2022 | 12:51
In a move called “Megxit,” Meghan Markle and Prince Harry denied giving up their positions as senior members of the royal family in exchange for greater solitude.
The pair, through their press secretary Ashley Hansen, told the New York Times on Thursday that nothing about privacy was mentioned in their statement outlining their intention to step aside.
Any suggestions to the contrary, the spokesperson continued, “speak to a crucial theme of this series.”
The tabloid media has produced a totally false narrative that dominates news coverage and public opinion, despite the fact that they are choosing to communicate their tale on their terms. The information is readily available to them.
A representative for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry called the assertion that they left the royal family over privacy concerns a “untrue narrative.”
The explanation comes in the midst of criticism of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s new “Harry & Megan” Netflix docuseries, in which they provide a more detailed insight inside their personal life.
“Megan & Prince Harry are a Royal joke!” one critic tweeted. “First they run away from their duties because they want a private life then they can’t stop dishing details on podcast, book, Oprah, Netflix show.”
“Harry and Megan: please respect our privacy,” said another. Additionally, Harry and Megan ask that you pay us for interviews so that we may protest the lack of the privacy we requested.
However, as Hansen pointed out, Harry and Meghan didn’t express a desire for more privacy in their initial statement.
The January 2020 statement stated, in part, “After many months of thought and internal debates, we have elected to undertake a change this year in starting to carve out a progressive new position within this institution.”